彩乐乐|网站

  • <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
  • <blockquote id="aoa84"><samp id="aoa84"></samp></blockquote>
  • <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
    <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
  • <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
  • December 31, 2014

    Notes on machine-generated data, year-end 2014

    Most IT innovation these days is focused on machine-generated data (sometimes just called “machine data”), rather than human-generated. So as I find myself in the mood for another survey post, I can’t think of any better idea for a unifying theme.

    1. There are many kinds of machine-generated data. Important categories include:

    That’s far from a complete list, but if you think about those categories you’ll probably capture most of the issues surrounding other kinds of machine-generated data as well.

    2. Technology for better information and analysis is also technology for privacy intrusion. Public awareness of privacy issues is focused in a few areas, mainly: Read more

    October 10, 2014

    Notes on predictive modeling, October 10, 2014

    As planned, I’m getting more active in predictive modeling. Anyhow …

    1. I still believe most of what I said in a July, 2013 predictive modeling catch-all post. However, I haven’t heard as much subsequently about Ayasdi as I had expected to.

    2. The most controversial part of that post was probably the claim:

    I think the predictive modeling state of the art has become:

    • Cluster in some way.
    • Model separately on each cluster.

    In particular:

    3. Nutonian is now a client. I just had my first meeting with them this week. To a first approximation, they’re somewhat like KXEN (sophisticated math, non-linear models, ease of modeling, quasi-automagic feature selection), but with differences that start: Read more

    July 12, 2013

    More notes on predictive modeling

    My July 2 comments on predictive modeling were far from my best work. Let’s try again.

    1. Predictive analytics has two very different aspects.

    Developing models, aka “modeling”:

    More precisely, some modeling algorithms are straightforward to parallelize and/or integrate into RDBMS, but many are not.

    Using models, most commonly:

    2. Some people think that all a modeler needs are a few basic algorithms. (That’s why, for example, analytic RDBMS vendors are proud of integrating a few specific modeling routines.) Other people think that’s ridiculous. Depending on use case, either group can be right.

    3. If adoption of DBMS-integrated modeling is high, I haven’t noticed.

    Read more

    Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

    Login

    Search our blogs and white papers

    Monash Research blogs

    User consulting

    Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

    Vendor advisory

    We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

    Monash Research highlights

    Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.

  • <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
  • <blockquote id="aoa84"><samp id="aoa84"></samp></blockquote>
  • <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
    <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
  • <blockquote id="aoa84"></blockquote>
  • education

    Go abroad

    Real estate

    Technology

    city

    aviation

    reading

    car

    game